HVCC clarification from Fannie and Freddie

There’s at lot of misinformation out there about the requirements of the Home Valuation Code of Conduct. The problem was bad enough that the good folks at NAR put some pressure on Fannie and Freddie to get them to set the record straight.

It worked. After NAR president Charles McMillan met with the New York Attorney General’s office, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Fannie Mae, a new bit of “guidance” came out for lenders.

“Some key items that the public should know,” it reads, and begins with perhaps the biggest issue:

Communications with appraisers – Contrary to some suggestions, the Code provides for communications with appraisers about errors, additional needed information and unprofessional conduct. Quality control personnel may communicate with appraisers and other lender personnel, outside of the loan origination function. The real bar is on communications that seek to influence the appraiser to adopt a set valuation, which is prohibited.

It also addresses some other myths and misconceptions:

Contrary to some suggestion, the Code does not favor the use of AMCs over independent or in-house appraisers.


The use of unqualified in-state or out-of-state appraisers, unfamiliar with local conditions, should be reported to state appraiser licensing agencies.

(Some of the others are less about correcting misinterpretations than about, well, wishful thinking. The HVCC, it says, isn’t responsible for longer turnaround times for appraisals, for example.)

Both companies have also updated the HVCC FAQs on their respective Web sites. Fannie’s is here, while Freddie’s is here.

If nothing else, the fact that Fannie and Freddie realized the need to clarify the HVCC is a heck of a victory. Kudos to McMillan and NAR for fighting the fight in Washington.

About Andrew Kantor

Andrew is VAR's editor and information manager, and -- lessee now -- a former reporter for the Roanoke Times, former technology columnist for USA Today, and a former magazine editor for a bunch of places. He hails from New York with stops in Connecticut, New Jersey, Cincinnati, Columbus, and Roanoke.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to HVCC clarification from Fannie and Freddie

  1. Pingback: Krisstina Wise, The GoodLife Team, Home Valuation Code of Conduct, Real Estate Appraisals | Blog with Krisstina

  2. Jim Rake says:

    Better late than never. It is easy to forget that HVCC guidance was prompted by, among other things, “communications that seek to influence the appraiser to adopt a set valuation”.
    Ever heard a Realtor, not to mention a lender, say they had an appraiser in their pocket, or something to that effect? From 2004-06, I certainly did.
    Putting legislation or guidelines into practice is rarely seamless and without problems. We normally “muddle through” until we get it right…or close to right.

    It’s good to see there’s progress being made, and separation of fact from fiction (“Contrary to some suggestion, the Code does not favor the use of AMCs over independent or in-house appraisers”), and that NAR appears to be in the fight.

  3. Pingback: Transcript of Last Week’s Radio Show | Real Central VA

  4. Kevin Rising says:

    The short answer is no. There is no language in the policy that forces a lender to use an AMC (Appraisal Management Company). However, like may policies and laws for that matter, it has an unintended effect on the market. Or maybe it is intended.

    The reality is that more lenders are using AMC’s since the implementation of the HVCC. Why you ask? It’s cheaper to use an AMC rather than maintain its own list. In exchange for the money lenders save they give up control of the appraisal roster. Doesn’t sound like a big deal, does it? Until you consider these facts.

    When lenders maintained their own list they employed people that knew the local appraiser. The appraiser profession is a tight knit community. They do actually meet and talk with one another. When one of these employees had an appraisal request for a two million dollar property they knew which appraisers were proficient in that type of property. The same goes for a manufactured home on five acres, mutli-family dwelling or the 203K rehab in urban areas. While a 3 year certified appraiser and a 20 year certified appraiser are technically capable of performing all those appraisals in a given state. Some are better at one type of appraisal over another. The local lender roster manager knew who that person was. An AMC does not. When the inexperienced appraiser takes that appraisal request for an AMC he or she is licensed to do the job but may not be competent to complete the task. That is called a USPAP violation. The buyer, seller, lender and real estate agents and the transaction then hang in the balance. The AMC knows the appraiser is licensed. Then its concerns turn to the fee and the turn around time. Let’s face it. An AMC is in business to make money. You can’t fault them for that. But selecting the appraiser is just as important as the seller selecting the Real Estate Agent. You want someone with experience in the market and the property type.

    Second, the lenders are allowed to own a percentage of the AMC. This is just one more reason the lender has to select an AMC over an independant appraiser. The fees they collect from taking a percentage of the appraiser’s fee go to the bottom line of the lender that selected an appraiser from an AMC it owns. It turns the AMC into a profit machine rather than a cost center.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *