Why did the Fed ignore the housing bubble? No one thought it would be THIS bad

Worthwhile reading from today’s Washington Post op-ed page, “Why the Federal Reserve slept before the housing crisis.” Unlike the typical blame-the-people-whose-politics-I-disagree-with piece, this one points to a much more mundane explanation of why, in 2006, the Fed apparently ignored all the signs of a major problem.

It wasn’t that they didn’t see the housing boom or recognize that it was ending. At 2006’s first meeting, a senior Fed economist noted “that we are reaching an inflection point in the housing boom. The bigger question now is whether we will experience (a) gradual cooling . . . or a more pronounced downturn.”

At that same meeting, Fed Governor Susan Bies warned that mortgage lending standards had become dangerously lax […] But [members of the Federal Open Market Committee] — and most private economists — didn’t draw the proper conclusions.

Hardly anyone asked whether lax mortgage lending would trigger a broad financial crisis, because America had not experienced a broad financial crisis since the Great Depression […] Because it hadn’t happened in decades, it was assumed that it couldn’t happen.

Click here to read the whole piece by Robert Samuelson.

About Andrew Kantor

Andrew is VAR's editor and information manager, and -- lessee now -- a former reporter for the Roanoke Times, former technology columnist for USA Today, and a former magazine editor for a bunch of places. He hails from New York with stops in Connecticut, New Jersey, Cincinnati, Columbus, and Roanoke.
This entry was posted in The Buzz. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Why did the Fed ignore the housing bubble? No one thought it would be THIS bad

  1. Tom says:

    Well, it seems stupid to me that they didn’t see it coming. Had Fed been little bit careful we would not have landed in mess that we are in today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *