Posts Tagged ‘GSE’

NAR issues Mortgage Market Update

Following is just-in from NAR’s Joe Ventrone (Vice President of Regulatory and Industry Relations):

Over the past few months, the GSEs (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) along with the Private Mortgage Insurance Industry (MIs) have been increasing fees and tightening up underwriting standards. This is a direct result of the mortgage crisis which surfaced last August. NAR is communicating with the GSEs about these changes and raising concerns about their impact on the market and unintended consequences. For example, the declining market policies may be stigmatizing entire markets and unfairly denying homeownership to homebuyers, especially minority and low income homebuyers. Although the recent GSE actions will have a significant impact on the mortgage and housing markets, we recognize they have suffered serious financial losses in recent quarters and their goal, like ours, is to make sure they are strong enough to continue making the secondary market work. Without the GSEs, the current crisis would have been much worse.

The following factors may help explain recent GSE decisions:
• These are essentially private entities that are universally losing billions because the mortgage markets in the last several years failed to apply strong underwriting standards.
• After what has happened in the mortgage market, with hundreds of billions of losses, a period of retrenchment is inevitable. A return to zero down mortgages is unlikely, which is not necessarily a bad thing.
• The FHA mortgage insurance program is a sound alternative for subprime and many Alt-A borrowers, People with weaker credit and a small downpayment should consider using FHA. There is a long history of FHA filling that role, and we expect the pending FHA reform legislation to help revitalize its programs and make them even more accessible.
• If Fannie and Freddie are charging too much and setting their standards unnecessarily high, considering the risk, there will be an opening for others to compete. Unfortunately, considering how cautious banks and other mortgage lenders have become, this could take considerable time.
Attached please find an update from our Real Estate Services program which was drafted by NAR consultants. This update provides up to date information on the current state of the mortgage market.

These are very trying times for our mortgage finance system, our members, and the American homebuying consumer. We at NAR are keeping abreast of up to the minute changes from the mortgage lending industry as well as the GSE’s and the financial regulatory agencies. In this regard, we continue to work with the GSEs on their declining markets policy. Please visit www.Realtor.org for current information. Please do not hesitate to call any of the following NAR staff if you have any questions.

NAR Contacts

FHA Programs Regulatory Contact:
Jerome Nagy, jnagy@realtors.org <mailto:jnagy@realtors.org> , 202.383.1233

FHA Programs Legislative Contact:
Megan Booth, mbooth@realtors.org <mailto:mbooth@realtors.org> , 202.383.1222

GSE Programs Regulatory Contact:
Jeff Lischer, jlischer@realtors.org <mailto:jlischer@realtors.org> , 202.383.1117

GSE Programs Legislative Contact:
Marcia Salkin, msalkin@realtors.org 202.383.1092

The skinny on the Stimulus Bill (HR 5140)

This, from NAR:

On February 13, 2008, the President signed the stimulus bill, H.R. 5140.  This is the first in a series of memorandums discussing the implementation of the two mortgage related provisions included in the signed measure.  The bill provides temporary increases to both the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and government sponsored enterprises (GSE) mortgage limits until December 31, 2008.  NAR will provide updated information on these provisions as it becomes available.

The new law makes seven temporary changes to the FHA and GSE loan limits: 
> Raises the base FHA loan limit (“floor”) to $271,050 (65 percent of the current GSE limit of $417,000),
> Sets the base GSE loan limit (“floor”) at $417,000.
> Raises the maximum FHA loan limit from $362,750 to $729,750 (175 percent of the Fannie/Freddie (GSE) floor of $417,000)
> For all areas where the FHA limit exceeds $417,000, the GSE limit will be the same as the FHA limit.  So, for example, if the FHA limit is $590,000, the GSE limit will also be $590,000.
> Increases the factor used to calculate FHA limits from 95 percent to 125 percent of area median sales price.  Any area with an area median sales price above $216,840 will benefit from this change.
> Replaces the existing FHA ratios used to calculate maximum loan amounts for two-, three- and four-family units financed by FHA with the ratio used by Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac ratios to calculate their limits for two-, three- and four family unit properties.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two-, three- and four family unit loan limits increase the same percentage that the single family limit increases.  In 2006, for example, the GSE single family limit increased 15.95 percent and the mortgage limits for multiple units increased 15.95 percent.  This change should result in significant increases in FHA limits for multi-unit properties.  The Secretary of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) will now have the discretion to raise the maximum FHA loan limit by an additional $100,000 for all properties (including 2-4 family units).

Implementation
HUD is required by the law to publish the new mortgage limits by March 14, 2008.  These new limits will be effective for FHA immediately upon publication.  NAR developed estimates of the temporary FHA and GSE single-family loan limits.  This data can be found here.

The NAR sent a letter to HUD on February 13, 2008, urging HUD to implement the limits as quickly as possible.

The implementation schedule is complicated by the fact that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be using the same limits above $417,000 and Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) Director James B. Lockhart, III (Fannie and Freddie’s regulator) noted in a recent speech that implementation could take up to three months with an additional month for partial enactment.  Mr. Lockhart offered no explanation as to what partial enactment means.  NAR sent a letter to OFHEO on February 13, 2008, urging immediate adoption of the new loan limits.

To date, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have not indicated their implementation plans once limits are established by OFHEO.

Eligible loans
> FHA – The statute applies to “mortgages for which the mortgagee has issued credit approval for the borrower on or before December 31, 2008”.  We believe this means any loan which receives underwriting approval before January 1, 2009.

> GSE – The statute applies to “mortgages originated during the period beginning on July 1, 2007, and ending at the end of December 31, 2008”.  We believe this means any loan originated before January 1, 2009.  This also means that GSE can buy loans that meet the new loan limits that were originated after June 30, 2007.  Consumers with existing jumbo mortgages may want to consider refinancing under the new loan limits prior to January 1, 2009.

What if I don’t think my loan limit accurately reflects the median home price?
FHA has a process by which the local area median loan limits may be challenged.  If you do not believe the published loan limit accurately reflects 125 percent of your median home price, you may provide HUD with comparable home sales data to make the case that the loan limit should be raised.  NAR is currently creating a guide for REALTORS on how to challenge your loan limit and it will be available shortly.

The opinions expressed below are from consultant Brian Chappelle, Partner, Potomac Partners 2127 S. Street N.W. Washington D.C.  20008.   These are the consultant’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views of NAR.

While every client must make their own decision on this topic, below is an assessment of the risks.

Areas at the new base loan limit (“floor”) of 65 percent of the current GSE limit ($417,000) = $271,050

Since this amount is established in the bill and the law requires that HUD implement the provision in 30 days, there appears to be minimal risk in taking applications at the higher base loan limit (“floor”) immediately.

If you wanted to close a loan at the higher base limit prior to HUD’s implementation of the statute, the primary risks are two-fold.  1) You would have to run the loan through the Total Scorecard again to remove the “Ineligible” message because of an excessive mortgage amount for the area.  If the borrower’s credit quality deteriorated in the interim, there could be an eligibility issue.  You could underwrite the loan manually to avoid this issue and 2) the insurance endorsement process.  A loan must be submitted within 60 days of closing.  Otherwise, the lender is required to certify that the most recent payment was made in the current month (See Mortgagee Letter 2005-23 for FHA late endorsement requirements)

High cost areas (Above $271,050)

The mortgage limit is determined by calculating 125 percent of the area median sales price which is determined at the county or metropolitan statistical area (MSA) level.  We believe that HUD is likely to use the same methodology and data that were utilized for calculating the 2008 mortgage limits.  However, although it has been less than 30 days since HUD published those limits, it is also possible that HUD could update its data.

Risk is Divided into Two Categories:
> First, for areas with mortgage amounts below the current Fannie/Freddie mortgage limit ($417,000), we see less risk since HUD will be able to make its decision independently and implement these limits reasonably soon (i.e. less than the month) and will probably not implement any special underwriting requirements.  The main issue is, of course, the calculation process for the maximum mortgage amount.  In this regard, maximum loan amounts are increasing in many high cost areas because of the 125 percent of area median calculation (instead of 95 percent that was previously used).  The issue is really how much.

> Second, for areas that will have maximum mortgage limits above the current Fannie/Freddie maximum limit, it is more complicated because of the impact on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the role of their regulator (OFHEO) and possible special pricing and underwriting requirements for these loans in addition to the calculation issue discussed above.

We believe there is much more uncertainty about the speed with which the new provisions will be implemented for loans above $417,000 particularly for conforming loans.  However, pricing and underwriting issues would also apply for FHA loans.  For example, since these loans will be available for a short period of time (until December 31, 2008), it is possible that Ginnie Mae would form special customized pools that could affect pricing.

NAR Contacts
> FHA Programs Regulatory Contact:
Jerome Nagy, jnagy@realtors.org, 202.383.1233

> FHA Programs Legislative Contact:
Megan Booth, mbooth@realtors.org, 202.383.1222

> GSE Programs Regulatory Contact:
Jeff Lischer, jlischer@realtors.org, 202.383.1117

> GSE Programs Legislative Contact:
Lynn King, lking@realtors.org, 202.383.1156

– Scott Brunner, CAE


•••

FosterCityBlog.com


Author login